Creativity and mental illness
Dr. Daniel Nettle, a psychologist at Newcastle University, and
Helen Clegg, at the Open University in Milton Keynes in the
U.K., have carried out an interesting survey on schizophrenics.
This form of mental ill-health is so debilitating that those
with the condition are often socially isolated, have trouble
maintaining relationships and consequently reproduce at a much
lower rate than the general population. However, cases of
schizophrenia remain high--perhaps 1% of the population. "On
the face of it, Darwinism would suggest that the genes leading
to schizophrenia would eventually disappear from the gene
pool," said Dr. Nettle. The word is that they don't disappear.
They may have gone underground.
And just who are these silent "carriers"? In the survey,
schizophrenics, regular folks, and yep, artists were tested. In
425 responses, they found that artists and schizophrenics
scored equally high on "unusual cognition," a trait that gives
rise to the tendency to feel in between reality and a dream
state, or to feel overwhelmed by one's own thoughts. But the
artists and schizophrenics scored very differently on something
else called "introvertive anhedonia"--social withdrawal and
emotional emptiness. Unlike schizophrenics, artists, in line
with the general population, scored very low on this one.
According to Dr. Nettle, the results suggest that the
creativity of some artists is fuelled by the unique world-view
that mental illness can provide, but without the debilitating
part. Indeed, by directing their energy into artistic projects,
these artists may be sidestepping their schizophrenic
tendencies. Furthermore, the second part of the survey found
that compared with the general population, artists claimed to
have had twice as many partners since the age of 18--and the
number of partners increased with the seriousness with which
they pursued their art.
Dr. Nettle believes that this provides an answer to some
long-asked questions. Some of the genes that predispose to
schizophrenia might be carried by artists--and in many cases
will play a part in directing their creativity--but because
artists tend also not to develop full-blown schizophrenia, they
simply pass the bad genes onto their kids. Artists' unusual
take on the world and their ability to channel creativity,
makes them desirable and therefore likely to be good breeders.
In other words, artists, especially those who stand out, are in
themselves aphrodisiacs.
PS: "What a pile of crap. Don't expect honesty from artists at
any time. Massive delicate egos and a myopic view of reality
don't make for any kind of study. Artists aren't that special."
(Dinos Chapman, The Guardian, U.K.)
Esoterica: Whenever artists' legendary hanky-panky is
mentioned, as it often is, names like Picasso are dragged out.
Fact is he was a complex of guilt, drive, manipulation, ego,
sublimation and libido. But I'm wondering if a lot of artists
might be unusually chaste. Somehow, so many of us just seem too
busy. As usual, I could be wrong. I love being wrong. "I put my
orgasms on canvas." (Pablo Picasso)